Affective Neuroscience with Jaak Panksepp (BSP 65)

by Ginger Campbell, MD on January 13, 2010

Episode 65 of the Brain Science Podcast is an interview with Jaak Panksepp, PhD, author of Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Dr. Panksepp has done pioneering work on the neural origins of emotions. In this interview we discuss how his work challenges some of the common assumptions about emotions and some of the important implications of his discoveries. New listeners may want to go back and listen to Episode 11 for an introduction to the neuroscience of emotion.

listen-to-audio Listen to Episode 65 (Free Podcast version)

Episode Transcript (Download PDF)

Subscribe to the Brain Science Podcast: itunes-badge-30 zunelogo-70 feed-icon32x32 mail-sticker-tiny

Click here for Premium Versions

References:

Scientists Mentioned in this Episode:

Announcements:

  • Reminder: sign-up for the BSP Newsletter to get show notes and other updates via email.
  • I am working on a CD version of this episode. It will be divided into multiple track to make it easier for you to find the parts you want to listen to again, and allow you to find your place if you are interrupted. It will also have most of the announcements and music removed.
  • Don’t forget to check out the BSP iPhone/Touch application.

Join our Discussion Forum: discussionforum

Join our Facebook Fan Page: FacebookFanBSP

Send feedback to gincampbell at mac dot com or leave voice mail at 205-202-0663.

{ 4 comments }

Diane Jacobs January 16, 2010 at 3:34 pm

Another great podcast!
Two things:

1. I heard him mention McLean (triune brain theory), and also checked one of his papers, where McLean was mentioned again as one of his foundational people. It’s my understanding based on the interview you did with Striedter that the McLean theory had been refuted. I wonder what Panksepp’s response is to this.

2. Also, just out of curiosity, I’d love to know what David Bainbridge’s ( Beyond the Zonules of Zinn, vet and neuroanatomist) opinion might be about Panksepp’s work.

Thank you for yet another thought-provoking episoode,
Diane Jacobs

Ginger Campbell, MD January 17, 2010 at 12:50 pm

Panksepp has acknowledged that some of McLean’s ideas are now considered outdated, but he considers his evolutionary approach worthwhile, and he continues to acknowledge that this approach has inspired his own work.

Peter Blackaby January 30, 2010 at 3:08 am

I was interested to hear of the differing opinions between Panksepp and Damasio. I thought the Damasio book ‘the feeling of what happens’ was brilliant, after the Pankseep interview I got the impression he felt Damasio was to ‘somatocentric’ . I would love you to get Damasio on to speak to see what his position is now.
Thanks for the wonderful podcasts.

Ginger Campbell, MD February 10, 2010 at 5:01 pm

According to Dr. Pankseep, The Feeling of What Happens was closer in spirit to his own work than Damasio’s later book Looking for Spinoza. It would be interesting to interview Damasio. I intend to contact him right away when he publishes something new.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 3 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: